| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of the restricted plot size and positioning of the building close to the boundaries result in a cramped over-development of the site to the detriment of the character of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 and DC69 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its position and proximity to neighbouring properties, cause overlooking and loss of privacy which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposed development would, by reason of its position and proximity to neighbouring properties, result in an overbearing development causing loss of outlook which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | In the absence of a mechanism to secure a planning obligation towards the infrastructure costs of new development the proposal is contrary to the provisions of the Havering Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC72 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 5. | In the absence of a mechanism to secure a planning obligation towards the infrastructure costs of new development the proposal is contrary to the provisions of the Havering Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 6. | Statement Required by Article 31 (cc) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management) Order 2010: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal, rather than negotiation, was in this case appropriate in accordance with para 186-187 of NPPF |
