| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed dwelling through its design, scale, bulk, depth and proximity to the shared boundaries would form an incongruous and visually cramped form of development at odds with the character of the surrounding area to the detriment of the visual amenity of the locality. The proposal would therefore be contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy D4 of the London Plan and also the guidance within the NPPF which requires fundamentally that development add to the overall quality of the area whilst also establishing or maintaining a strong sense of place. |
| 2. | The proposed dwelling would form a visually intrusive and overbearing feature within the rear garden environment due to the excessive depth of the proposed rear projections and their proximity to the shared boundaries which would be detrimental to neighbouring amenity and therefore be contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031. There would also be conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework. |
| 3. | The proposed rear dormer windows would, by reason of its height, position and bulk appear out of scale and character with the dwelling and materially harmful to the visual amenity of the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, Havering's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD, Policy D4 of the London Plan and also the guidance within the NPPF. |
| 4. | The development in the form of the front boundary wall, gates and railings would by reason of its design, height and position close to the property boundary form an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature, harmful to the appearance of the street scene and detracting from the open character of the surrounding area, contrary to the Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, Havering's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD, Policy D4 of the London Plan and also the guidance within the NPPF. |
| 5. | The proposed boundary treatment, by reason of its excessive height fails to provide adequate levels of visibility for vehicles when they egress from the site which has created an unsafe environment for pedestrians and other vehicles contrary to Policy 7 and 24 of the Local Plan. |
| 6. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Breden by e-mail on 26/09/24. |
| 7. | For Residential Development Only
Please be advised that approval of this application from 1st September 2019 (either by London Borough of Havering, or subsequently by PINS if allowed on appeal following a refusal by London Borough of Havering) will attract a liability payment of £104,100 plus indexation in Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). This charge has been levied under s.206 of the Planning Act 2008 and includes both the Mayor of London's CIL and Havering Council's CIL.
London Borough of Havering, as CIL collecting authority, has responsibility for the collection of the Mayoral CIL, in addition to Havering's CIL, on commencement of the development.
Your proposal is subject to a CIL Liability Notice indicating a levy of £104,100 plus indexation for the application, based on the Mayoral CIL levy rate for Havering of £25/sq.m plus Havering's charging rate for residential of £125/sq.m (Zone A), and the floorspace of 694 square metres.
You are advised to visit the planning portal website where you can download the appropriate document templates.
http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/planning/applications/howtoapply/whattosubmit/cil |
