| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would by virtue of the design, scale and mass would appear incongruous, dominant and visually intrusive in the rear garden environment and given its forward position harmful to the visual amenity of the street scene contrary to policies 7.4 and 7.6 of The London Plan (2016), policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008, and the London Borough of Havering Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2011. |
| 2. | The proposed extensions would, by reason of their excessive width, height, bulk and proximity to shared boundaries, be unneighbourly giving rise to an overbearing impact and an increased sense of enclosure, loss of outlook, overlooking, loss of privacy to the detriment of the amenity of adjoining occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008, and the London Borough of Havering Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2011. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Philip Conway via email on 05th October 2020. |
