| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would by reason of its height, gabled end, scale, bulk and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an unneighbourly development and appear dominant and visually intrusive in the rear garden environment harmful to the amenity of No. 226 Brentwood Road contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The amenity space for the proposed dwelling is of poor quality, given its siting and limited depth. The insufficient provision of amenity space for the proposed two bedroom dwelling would result in a cramped layout which would be harmful to the amenity of future occupiers and contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Design for Living Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 3. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Shahkamrani on the telephone on 28th September 2017. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1,680. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
