| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed rear extension would, by reason of the excessive amount of glazing / opening facing the shared boundary with no.78 Parkway, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development that would result in a significant level of overlooking and loss of privacy, detrimental to the occupiers at no.78 and their enjoyment of their rear garden contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 2. | The proposed rear dormer would, by reason of its scale, design and bulk, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature detrimental to the character and appearance of the host property and conservation area contrary to Policy 7, 26 and 28 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application. |
