| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed two storey front extension would, by reason of its unsympathetic design, bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and incongruous feature in the streetscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent by email on the 22 July 2016. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: In accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012, improvements required to make the proposal acceptable were negotiated with the agent by mail on 11/8/16. The revisions involved the removal of the proposed two storey front extension or its replacement with a modest single storey structure more in keeping with front extensions in the local area. The applicant did not make the suggested revisions before the expiry date of the application. |
