| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development fails to be subservient in design by reason of the lack of 1m set back at first floor level. In combination with the proposed gabled roof form on the side extension and to the main roof, be incongruous, dominant and harmful to the character of the host dwelling and unbalance the symmetry of the semi-detached pair, contrary to Policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document 2008, the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document 2011. |
| 2. | The proposed development would by reason of the overall bulk, mass, scale and design of the excessively large rear dormer, appear dominant, incongruous, thereby causing visual harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document 2008, the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document 2011. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application. |
