| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development, by reason of the overall bulk, mass, scale and design, would appear incongruous and harmful in the rear garden scene and the streetscene as well as unbalancing the symmetry of the semi-detached pair, contrary to Havering's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (adopted 2011) and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD (adopted 2008). |
| 2. | The proposed two storey side extension, by reason of being built to the common boundary would impact upon the amenities of the neighbour at no. 24 Grey Towers, in terms of blocking access to light for their side facing window and impacting on the rear window as well, contrary to Havering's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (adopted 2011) and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD (adopted 2008). |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal was given to the agent via email. |
