| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development, by reason of its scale, bulk, mass, would appear incongruous, dominant and visually intrusive in the rear garden environment. This will be harmful to the open spacious character and due to its close proximity to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document, the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan. |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Seager (Agent) by e-mail on 09/10/18. |
| 3. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £4,320. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
