OcellaWeb

No.	Condition Text
1.	The proposed front extension would, by reason of its height, bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to London Borough of Havering Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008. The proposal would also disrupt the uniformity and symmetry of the terrace properties contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document 2011, and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document.
2.	Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Cameron, by email sent 15/10/19.

No.

Condition Text

The proposed front extension would, by reason of its height, bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to London Borough of Havering Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008. The proposal would also disrupt the uniformity and symmetry of the terrace properties contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document 2011, and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document.

Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Cameron, by email sent 15/10/19.

The London Borough Of Havering - Home page