| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed extension would by reason of its incongruous design, appearance and position cause material harm to the building's distinctive Art Deco architectural form and integrity and would thereby harm the character and appearance of the streetscene contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The complete absence of on site parking for the new units would create increased vehicular demands on the adjacent access road and the site's vicinity materially harmful to amenity and safety contrary to Policies DC32 and DC33 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposal by reason of the number of new units, their relationship to existing flats within the block, the limited amount of amenity provision and absence of car parking provision represents an overdevelopment of the site harmful to the character of the area and amenity of neighbouring residents contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: During consideration by the committee, members placed different weight on the planning merits and decided to refuse planning permission. |
| 6. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £5840.00. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
