| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would by reason of its siting on a constrained site within close proximity of the boundaries result in an visually intrusive form of development that would compromise the amenity of neighbouring properties by way of harm to outlook, sense of enclosure, loss of light and overbearing impact contrary to the objectives of Policy 26 of the Local Plan and Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021. |
| 2. | The proposed depth of the forecourt would result in an unacceptable parking arrangement, which would result in an increased parking congestion in surrounding streets detrimental to the safety and operation of the surrounding highway network contrary to Policy 24 of the Havering Local Plan and Policies T6 and T6.1 of the London Plan and paragraph 111 of the National Planning Policy Framework. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application. |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal would be liable for mayoral CIL and Havering CIL, with a total of £8,700.00 CIL liability subject to indexation.
Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
