| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its size, position and proximity to neighbouring boundaries represent an over-dominant and visually intrusive form of development out of character with the pattern and form of development in this rear garden setting and as such would have a serious and adverse effect on the character of the area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposal would, by reason of its bulk, scale, mass, height and position close to the boundaries of the site, give rise to an intrusive and unneighbourly development that is materially harmful to the amenity of occupiers of neighbouring property contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the applicant on 25 September 2017. |
