| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of the inadequate provision of amenity space, result in a cramped over-development of the site to the detriment of future occupiers and the character of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy. |
| 2. | The proposed development would represent an over-development of the site and a poor quality living environment for future residents due to an inadequate setting and poor outlook which would create an unacceptable living environment for future occupiers, to the detriment of their residential amenity. The proposed development is therefore contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Residential Design SPD. |
| 3. | In the absence of an agreement to prevent future occupiers from obtaining residents parking permits, the proposals would fail to mitigate the increased demand for on-street parking and the impact that this would have on surrounding roads, with the increased completion for parking would potentially be to the detriment of the amenity of surrounding occupiers, contrary to Policies DC61 and DC33 of the LDF Core Strategy. |
| 4. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent in writing 15-09-2017. |
