| No. | Condition Text |
|---|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its design and appearance, result in unsympathetic, visually intrusive development which would not preserve or enhance the special character of this part of the Conservation Area contrary to Policies DC61 and DC68 of the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document, as well as the the Heritage Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: In accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012, improvements required to make the proposal acceptable were negotiated with Amandeep Manku via email on 28.09.17. Revisions were requested which would sufficiently retain the original design features of the building. In doing so, the works would complement or improve the character of the dwelling and simultaneously preserve or enhance the character of the wider Conservation Area. The applicant declined to make the suggested revisions. |
