| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its location, positioning in relation to neighbouring dwellings, height, bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposal would, by reason of its design and the proposed location of its vehicular access, result in an increase in risk for road users and pedestrians using the junction of Masefield Cresecent and Masefield Close contrary to the Policies DC 32 and DC 34 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposed layout of the development would be inadequate resulting in substandard accommodation for future residents through restricted internal area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and London Plan Policy 3.5. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent by email on 14/4/16 |
