| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its design and relationship to the existing dwelling and terrace, be out of character with the surrounding area and harmful to the appearance of the streetscene contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its height, bulk, mass and position, result in unacceptable impacts on the amenity space of an adjoining dwelling, to the detriment of occupiers and the character of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposed development fails to meet Nationally Prescribed Space Standards for new residential accommodation resulting in an unsatisfactory quality of accommodation which is materially harmful to the amenity of future occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, Policy 3.5 of the London Plan and the London Plan Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance Note. |
| 4. | The proposed development would, by reason of the inadequate on site car parking provision, result in unacceptable overspill onto the adjoining roads to the detriment of highway safety and residential amenity and contrary to Policy DC33 of the Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 5. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 6. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent, Spaces Architecture, by email dated 12/10/16. |
| 7. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1,315 (subject to indexation, this figure may go up or down). Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
