| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its discordant design, appear as a incongruous and visually instructive feature within the streetscene, out of character with surrounding development to the detriment of the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, the Residential Design SPD and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan. |
| 2. | The proposed development will give rise to undersized and poor standard of accommodation, to the detriment of the living conditions of future occupiers.. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy DC03 and DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy, Development Control Policies DPD, the Residential Design SPD and Policy 3.5 and 7.6 of the London Plan and The London Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance. |
| 3. | The proposed development would, by reason of the inadequate on site car parking provision, result in unacceptable overspill onto the adjoining roads to the detriment of highway safety and residential amenity. Therefore the proposal is contrary to Policy DC33 of the Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £2182.50. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 6. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent on 19/12/2018. |
