| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The part single/part two storey rear extension, by reason of its excessive scale, bulk and mass appears as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden environment harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan, D4 of the London Plan, Havering's Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and the NPPF. |
| 2. | The part single/part two storey rear extension would, by reason of its depth, height and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent neighbours contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 3. | Works to the Loft Informative
The application dwelling has benefited from a hip to gable and rear dormer window under permitted development, however, no certificate of lawfulness has been submitted to corroborate that this development complies with permitted development criteria. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr R Patel (Agent) by e-mail on 04/01/24. |
