| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its height, siting and design, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 and DC64 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its siting and height within close proximity of residential dwellings, result in an unsightly and visually intrusive addition to the building which is harmful to the amenity of surrounding residential properties, contrary to Policy DC61 and DC64 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposed development would, by reason of its siting and design, result in a visually intrusive addition that detracts from the heritage and architectural qualities of the listed building and fails to enhance or preserve the special historic and architectural character of this listed building, contrary to the Policy DC67 and DC64 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the NPPF. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent via email on 4/1/21. |
