| No. | Condition Text |
|---|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its excessive width, scale, bulk, mass and cramped appearance of the extension, combined with the lack of set back at first floor level, unacceptably unbalance the appearance of this pair of semi-detached house and appear as a dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene, harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The applicant is advised that there should be no overhanging guttering onto the neighbouring land from the garage extension as any planning permission would not grant permission for any part of the development to encroach onto any property not within the applicant's ownership unless the relevant notification has been served. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Neobard by e-mail on the 31/10/16. |
