| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development by reason of its excessive width, bulk, mass, cramped appearance and lack of subservience would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene, harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed rear dormer windows would, by reason of their number, position, scale, bulk and mass appear out of scale and character with the dwelling and materially harmful to the visual amenity of the surrounding area contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposed rear dormers windows would, by reason of their position and proximity to neighbouring properties cause overlooking and loss of privacy which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers, contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | The applicant is advised that this planning permission does not grant permission for any part of the development to encroach onto any property not within the applicant's ownership. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Ellis by phone (voicemail left) on 02/11/2017. |
