| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed new dwelling due to its height, bulk, mass and location in a rear garden environment characterised by modest outbuildings, will form a dominant and visually intrusive feature detrimental to the character and appearance of the locality and the established pattern of development, contrary to the high-quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), policies D3 and D4 of The London Plan (2021) and Policies 7 and 26 of the Local Plan. |
| 2. | The proposed development by reason of its height, bulk and mass and close relationship to the shared boundary with no.18 would result noise and disturbance as well as being a visually intrusive feature and having an overbearing impact to the detriment of their amenity and the enjoyment of their rear garden environment contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), policies D3 and D4 of The London Plan (2021) and Policies 7 and 26 of the Local Plan. |
| 3. | The proposed new drop kerb due to its close proximity to the bend would have an adverse impact on the safety of other road users and pedestrians contrary to Policy T4 of The London Plan (2021) and Policy 23 of the Local Plan. |
| 4. | The proposed development would, by reason of the loss of trees would cause overlooking and loss of privacy on the existing and future residents of the donor dwelling which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of these occupiers and the visual amenity of the locality, contrary to Policy 7, 10 and 26 of the Local Plan. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Amendments were sought by staff which addressed issues with parking, however it was not considered that the above reasons for refusal were capable of being overcome. Consideration was given to seeking fruther amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent by email on 11//1/22. |
| 6. | In the event that this application is allowed through the appeals process the proposals would be liable for the following CIL contributions:
The proposals would incur a Mayoral CIL contribution of £2250 at a rate of £25 per sqm (90m² x 25).
The proposal is also liable for the Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (HCIL), which has a charging rate of £55.00 per square metre of net additional floor space in Zone B. The Havering Community Infrastructure Levy contribution would equate to £4,950, both subject to indexation.
Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
