| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposal by reason of its lack of a rear garden represents a cramped and uncharacteristic form of development that adversely affect the amenity of prospective occupants and the character of the pattern of development in the local area. Therefore, the proposal would fail to comply with Policies DC3 and DC61 of the London Borough of Havering Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008 and Policy 3.5 of the London Plan. |
| 2. | The proposed house by reason of being detached and single storey would be out of character with the two storey terraced housing that characterises the local area to the detriment of the form of development in the local area. Therefore, the proposal would fail to comply with Policies CP17 and DC61 of the London Borough of Havering Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008.Core |
| 3. | The proposed front extension of the existing garage by reason of its close proximity to ground floor rear habitable neighbouring windows at 220 Elm Park Avenue would adversely affect the outlook of the occupants, to the detriment of their amenity. Therefore, the proposal would fail to comply with Policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the Agent in a site meeting on 9th November 2018. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1218. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
