| No. | Condition Text |
|---|---|
| 1. | The proposed development, by virtue of poor design, scale, bulk, mass and roof form lack subservience to the existing dwelling and would appear as an unacceptably cramped, dominant, incongruous and visually intrusive feature, harmful to the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and of the front scene contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations and Emerson Park Policy Area SPDs, and Policies DC61 and DC69 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application. |
