OcellaWeb

No.	Condition Text
1.	The proposed balcony area on top of the single storey rear extension would be unneighbourly and intrusive by reason of its height, size, excessive depth and position close to the boundary of the site with No.4 Freeman Way. In addition, the balcony area would give rise to an intensification of use and result in undue noise and disturbance harmful to residential amenity, particularly No.4 Freeman Way, contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy Development Control Policies Plan Document.
2.	Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Otter (Agent) by phone on 09/11/17.

No.

Condition Text

The proposed balcony area on top of the single storey rear extension would be unneighbourly and intrusive by reason of its height, size, excessive depth and position close to the boundary of the site with No.4 Freeman Way. In addition, the balcony area would give rise to an intensification of use and result in undue noise and disturbance harmful to residential amenity, particularly No.4 Freeman Way, contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy Development Control Policies Plan Document.

Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Otter (Agent) by phone on 09/11/17.

The London Borough Of Havering - Home page