| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposal, by reason of the excessive density of the development proposed and the inadequate provision of amenity space, is considered to be an overdevelopment of the site, which gives rise to a poor quality of living accommodation for future residents and is thereby contrary to Policy DC61 of the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document, the Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document and Policy 3.5 of the London Plan. |
| 2. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: During consideration by the committee, members placed different weight on the planning merits and decided to refuse planning permission. |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £8,460.00. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
