OcellaWeb

No.	Condition Text
1.	The rear dormer window extension, by reason of its width is judged to appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the roof of this property, harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The development is therefore contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD, which requires development to maintain, enhance or improve the character and appearance of the local area.
2.	Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Breden, by Email on 02.11.2017.

No.

Condition Text

The rear dormer window extension, by reason of its width is judged to appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the roof of this property, harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The development is therefore contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD, which requires development to maintain, enhance or improve the character and appearance of the local area.

Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Breden, by Email on 02.11.2017.

The London Borough Of Havering - Home page