| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The development would, by reason of its incongruous roof design, width and design, give rise to a form of development which is out of keeping with neighbouring development and visually intrusive in the streetscene, harmful to the character of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD. |
| 2. | The proposed development by reason of its position forward of the front wall of the neighbouring property would appear as an incongruous, overbearing and visually intrusive feature to the front of the property, which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of the adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposal, by reason of the cramped and poor quality garden area, is considered to result in an over-development of the site to the detriment of the amenity of future residential occupiers and associated living environment. The proposal would therefore be contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Residential Design SPD. |
| 4. | The proposed development would, by reason of the awkward and inadequate on site car parking provision for the proposed dwelling and the donor property, result in unacceptable overspill onto the adjoining roads to the detriment of highway safety and residential amenity contrary to Policies DC2 and DC33 of the LDF Development Control Policies DPD and the London Plan. |
| 5. | The proposal fails to provide suitable measures to address the infrastructure needs arising from the development, contrary to Policy DC72 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and Supplementary Planning Document on Planning Obligations. |
| 6. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1,180. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 7. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the applicant's agent by email on 10 November 2017. |
