| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposal would result in the loss of public open space contrary to Policy DC18 (Protection of Public Open Space, Recreation, Sports and Leisure Facilities) of the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 2. | The proposal would cause traffic congestion and consequently would have an adverse impact on the functioning of the road network contrary to Policy DC32 (The Road Network) of the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 3. | The proposal would result in a development which is out of character with the surrounding area and which provides cramped units of accommodation contrary to Policy DC3 (Housing Design and Layout) of the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 4. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 5. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for children's play space arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies CP8, DC30 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 6. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: During consideration by the committee, members placed different weight on the planning merits and decided to refuse planning permission. |
