| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed dwelling would have a significant visual impact on the perception of openness in the rear garden setting, which is a key characteristic of the Emerson Park Policy Area, and contrary to Policy CP17, DC61, DC69, and DC72 of the Council's Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008, and the Emerson Park Policy Area SPD, and Policy 7.4 of The London Plan 2011. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its position and proximity to neighbouring properties cause overlooking,loss of privacy and loss of outlook which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | In the absence of a mechanism to secure a planning obligation towards the infrastructure costs of new development the proposal is contrary to the provisions of the Havering Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC72 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £4,600. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 31 (cc) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management) Order 2010: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal, rather than negotiation, was in this case appropriate in accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012. |
