| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would result in the loss of eight off-street visitor parking spaces with no re-provision made within the site. The applicant has not successfully demonstrated that the retained parking arrangements would adequately cater for the school and the proposed dwelling. Furthermore the red-line plan for the site does not take in all land required to gain access to the proposed dwelling and accordingly access and the parking space shown could not be relied upon. In the absence of any compelling evidence otherwise it has not been demonstrated that there would not be conflict with Havering Local Plan 2016-2031 Policies 8(iv) and 24, London Plan T6 and Para 116 of the Framework. |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent in writing 09-02-2026. |
| 3. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London and Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the Mayoral CIL payable would be £5250 based on the calculation of £25.00 per square metre and the Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (HCIL) would be a charge of £26,250 based on calculation of £125 per square metre. Each would be subject to indexation.
Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 4. | If a resubmission is made, the red-line plan must show the whole extent of the land to which the planning permission would apply. It must encompass all land necessary to carry out the proposed development, including access to a public highway. |