| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its height, bulk, mass and design, including the twin apex gabled roof and gabled front projections with balconies, appear incongruous, dominant and visually intrusive in the streetscene, as well as appearing dominant and overbearing in the adjacent rear garden setting, harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Ross via email on 11th June 2018. |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £12,774. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
