| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its cramped internal layout, including lack of provision of built in internal storage space and the cramped and overlooked nature of the amenity space arrangement, establish a property which fails to ensure the provision of adequate internal space and suitable amenity space. This scheme would be detrimental to the living conditions and amenity of the property's future occupiers contrary to Policies DC55, DC61of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, the Residential Design SPD and Policies 3.5 and 7.4 of the London Plan. |
| 2. | The proposed development would intensify the use of the site to the detriment of local amenity and through the requirement for additional refuse and cycle storage facilities would not be in keeping with the appearance and established character of the surrounding area. In doing so, the development would be contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposal would fail to provide a minimum of one family unit of 3 or more bedrooms. As such, the principal of the proposal would not adhere with (ii) and (iiii) of Section 7.7 (Policy 9) of Havering Local Plan 2016-2031 (Proposed submission version) currently under examination. |
| 4. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Balbir Dhanjal via email on 14/12/18. |
| 6. | The planning obligations recommended in this report have been subject to the statutory tests set out in Regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 and the obligations are considered to have satisfied the following criteria:-
(a) Necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms;
(b) Directly related to the development; and
(c) Fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development. |
