| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed extension, by reason of its scale, bulk, mass and design, would form a visually intrusive and overly dominant piece of development which would be detrimental to the character of the immediate and wider street-scene and would therefore be contrary to Havering Local Plan Policies 7 and 26 and the design guidance within the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD. There would be conflict also with the NPPF which at Para 130(a) which requires development add to the overall quality of the area. |
| 2. | The proposed extension, by reason of its scale, bulk, mass and proximity to shared boundary of the adjoining site where a permission has been implemented for a new dwelling, would form an intrusive and overbearing feature which would be detrimental to the outlook and result in an increased sense of enclosure to the future occupiers of the dwelling. The development is therefore be contrary to Havering Local Plan Policies 7 and 26 and the design guidance within the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application. |
