| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed dwellings would, by reason of their bulk, height, substantial loss of existing trees and proximity to the shared boundaries, would appear as a dominant and visually intrusive feature to the detriment of the visual amenity of the locality contrary to Policies 7, 10, 26 and 27 of the Havering Local Plan and Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021. |
| 2. | The proposed development, by reason of their bulk, height and proximity to the shared boundaries of the properties in Thameshill Avenue, would result in a dominant, overbearing and visually intrusive feature that would be detrimental to the amenity of the occupiers of nos 21, 23 & 25 in particular, due to a loss of outlook, increased sense of enclosure and overshadowing of rear gardens, contrary to Policies 7 and 10 of the Havering Local Plan. |
| 3. | Insufficient information has been submitted as part of the application for the ecological impacts of the proposed pair of semi-detached dwellings to be assessed, contrary to Policies 10 and 27 of the Havering Local Plan and Policy G7 of the London Plan 2021. |
| 4. | In the event that this application is allowed through the appeals process, the proposals would be liable for the following CIL contributions:
Mayoral CIL (MCIL2) contribution of £6,000 (x £25 per sqm).
Havering CIL (HCIL) contribution of £30,000 (x £125 per sqm)
Each contribution would be subject to indexation. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal was given to the agent via email on 25/01/2024. |
