| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its excessive depth, bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature, harmful to the appearance of the rear garden environment and the surrounding area contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations and Hall Lane Policy Area SPDs and Policies DC61 and DC69 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed rear extensions would, by reason of height, depth and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers including the light, outlook and being overbearing contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposed terraced area would, by reason of their position and proximity to neighbouring properties cause overlooking and loss of privacy which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Salmon (Agent) by e-mail on 27/11/17. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £5,880. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
