| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The development would, by reason of the siting, height and proximity to the boundaries of the plot, give rise to a cramped appearance and overdevelopment of the site, which would be harmful to the streetscene and character of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD. |
| 2. | The proposed development by reason of its position and proximity to the neighbouring properties would appear as an incongruous, overbearing and visually intrusive feature which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of the adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposal fails to provide suitable measures to address the infrastructure needs arising from the development, contrary to Policy DC72 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and Supplementary Planning Document on Planning Obligations. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2018, improvements required to make the proposal acceptable were negotiated with Daniel Brandon over the phone and via email in December 2018. The revisions involved reducing the bulk and mass of the dwellings in order to better reflect the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The suggested revisions were not made. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £4,040. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 6. | The planning obligations recommended in this report have been subject to the statutory tests set out in Regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 and the obligations are considered to have satisfied the following criteria:-
(a) Necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms;
(b) Directly related to the development; and
(c) Fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development. |
