OcellaWeb

No.	Condition Text
1.	The proposed single storey rear extension due to its disproportionate depth lack subservience to the existing dwelling and would appear dominant and visually intrusive in the rear garden environment, harmful to local character and neighbouring amenity, contrary to policies 7.4 and 7.6 of The London Plan (2016), policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008, and the London Borough of Havering Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2011.
2.	Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the applicant and agent by email on 31/01/2020.

No.

Condition Text

The proposed single storey rear extension due to its disproportionate depth lack subservience to the existing dwelling and would appear dominant and visually intrusive in the rear garden environment, harmful to local character and neighbouring amenity, contrary to policies 7.4 and 7.6 of The London Plan (2016), policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008, and the London Borough of Havering Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2011.

Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the applicant and agent by email on 31/01/2020.

The London Borough Of Havering - Home page