| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its cramped appearance within its plot, together with its bulk and mass, appear as an incongruous and uncharacteristic feature in the street scene and an acceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature when viewed from the rear garden environment of adjacent premises. The development would, therefore, appear unrelated and disjointed within the surrounding residential street arrangement and consequently harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | In the absence of a mechanism to secure a planning obligation towards the infrastructure costs of new development the proposal is contrary to the provisions of the Havering Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC72 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent in writing 09-01-2017 |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1320. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
