| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would by reason of the restrictive and constrained plot would irrevocably harm local character by deviating from the established pattern of development, appearing cramped and out of keeping with the more generously spaced plots within the area. The development would therefore be contrary to policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering's LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008 and the Adopted Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document 2011, which requires that development to respond to and integrate with existing patterns of development and, therefore, maintain, enhance or improve the character and appearance of the local area. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its scale, bulk and mass and proximity to the site boundaries, appear as a dominant and overbearing feature harmful to the visual amenity of adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering's LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008, and the Adopted Residential Design SPD 2011. |
| 3. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the London Borough of Havering's LDF Development Control Policies DPD 2008, and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan 2016. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent during a telephone conversation 26-02-2019. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £2,520. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 6. | The planning obligations outlined within the officer report have been subject to the statutory tests set out in Regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 and the obligations are considered to have satisfied the following criteria:-
(a) Necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms;
(b) Directly related to the development; and
(c) Fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development. |
