| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed layout of the development would be inadequate resulting in substandard accommodation for future residents through poor outlook and limited light, detrimental to future residential amenity and contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, Policy 3.5 of the London Plan (as amended) and the Residential Design SPD. |
| 2. | The amenity space for the proposed dwelling is of poor quality, given its small size, siting and layout and would be overshadowed for most of the day and result in a cramped layout harmful to the amenity of future occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 of Local Development Framework Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document and the Design for Living Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 3. | The proposed dwelling would, by reason of its height, scale, bulk, mass, siting and position close to the boundaries of the site, appear incongruous and give rise to a cramped appearance and overdevelopment harmful to the open and spacious character and appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | The proposed development, would by reason of its height, scale, bulk, mass, siting and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an unneighbourly development, result in perceived overlooking and loss of privacy and appear dominant and visually intrusive in the rear garden environment harmful to the residential amenity of adjacent occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 5. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 6. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Wiffen via email on 12th January 2017. |
| 7. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1,900. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
