| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposal would, by reason of its lack of set back from the front of the existing fence and zig-zag fashion against the character of the building, result in a dominant and visual intrusive extension detrimental to the character and appearance of the host property and visual amenity of the locality contrary to Policy 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021. |
| 2. | The proposed rear extension, by reason of its excessive depth would form a dominant and intrusive feature resulting in a structure not subordinate to the host dwelling contrary to Policy 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021 and Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2011. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent by e-mail. |
