OcellaWeb

No.	Condition Text
1.	The proposed first floor rear extension would, by reason of its depth, design, height and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development, as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers at No.27 The Crescent, Upminster contrary to Policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering's Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document 2008, the Adopted Borough Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document 2011, and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan.
2.	Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Card (Agent) by e-mail on 24/01/19.

No.

Condition Text

The proposed first floor rear extension would, by reason of its depth, design, height and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development, as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers at No.27 The Crescent, Upminster contrary to Policy DC61 of the London Borough of Havering's Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document 2008, the Adopted Borough Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document 2011, and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan.

Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Card (Agent) by e-mail on 24/01/19.

The London Borough Of Havering - Home page