| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The first floor rear extension by reason of its scale, bulk and mass would relate unacceptably to the subject dwelling and appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden environment and within the surrounding area, contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 2. | The proposed first floor rear extension would, by reason of its height and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of the adjacent neighbours contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 3. | The proposed development by reason of the obscured glazed first floor flank bedroom window, would be harmful to the outlook of the current and future occupiers contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 4. | The proposed first floor flank window, by reason of its position and proximity to the neighbouring properties would result in the potential for perceived over/inter-looking and loss of privacy which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers to the north of the application dwelling at Nos. 16-20 Cypress Path, Romford, contrary to the Residential Extension and Alteration Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Awan by e-mail on the 22/12/17. |
