| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The amenity space for Flats 1-4 is of poor quality, given its limited depth, small size and cramped layout and the lack of private amenity space provision for flats 5, 6 and 7 is harmful to the amenity of future occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 of Local Development Framework Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document and the Design for Living Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 2. | The proposed development would by reason of its height, scale, bulk, mass and position close to the boundaries of the site, give rise to a cramped appearance and overdevelopment of the site and appear dominant, visually intrusive and overbearing in the rear garden environment harmful to the amenity of neighbouring properties, including overlooking, perceived overlooking and loss of light, and would adversely affect the quality of the communal amenity space provision of No.'s 13-27 Monkwood Close. |
| 3. | The cycle and refuse stores would, by reason of their siting and poor accessibility, be an impractical and inconvenient arrangement detrimental to future residential amenity and would impede servicing within the site contrary to Policies DC36 and DC61 of the Local Development Framework, Policy 6.9 of the London Plan and the guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework. |
| 4. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Ideal Design Limited via email on 27th March 2019. |
| 6. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £3,740. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
