| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden environment harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed two storey rear extension would, by reason of its excessive depth and height, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having an undue enclosing effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent, Mr Breden, by email on 29th January 2016. |
