| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed part two storey rear extension, by reason of its scale, bulk and mass and close proximity to the boundary of the site, in conjunction with other development at the site, relates unacceptably to the subject dwelling and appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden environment, contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 2. | The proposed part two storey rear extension and pitched roof connecting the ground and first floor extensions would, by reason of its excessive height and position close to the boundaries of the site, taken also in conjunction with other development at the site, result in an intrusive and unneighbourly development, which would be dominant and overbearing in relation to the neighbouring residential property, harmful to the residential amenity of No.73 Meadow Road, Romford and contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Mizu by e-mail on the 25/04/16. |
