| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development, by reason of its lack of set back at first floor level to the side extension and in conjunction with its excessive width, depth, scale, bulk and mass of the two storey front and rear extensions, would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene and rear garden environment harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its excessive width, depth and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive, overbearing and unneighbourly development as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers of the neighbouring resident at No.1 Garland Way, Hornchurch contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 3. | Preparation of Re-submisison
It is should be noted that the canopy porch should be shown on the proposed floor plan when re-submitting a further application. In addition, it would be beneficial for a proposed block plan being provided showing that two parking spaces, each dimensioned 4.8m long by 2.4m wide can be provided within the site, mindful of the loss of the garage as part of the proposal. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Breden (Agent) by e-mail on 10-01-23. |
