| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its excessive scale, bulk, height and design appear as an unacceptably dominant, oppressive and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene and be detrimental to visual amenity and to the character and appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Local Plan Policy 26. |
| 2. | In the absence of a daylight and sunlight report to demonstrate otherwise, the proposed development would have an unacceptable impact on the daylight received within the rear rooms of No. 75 Carlisle Road and No's 69 and 71 Carlisle Road and due to the close proximity to the boundary of these properties would overshadow their rear gardens contrary to Local Plan Policy 7. |
| 3. | The change of use of the site from Use class F1(f) to Use Class C3 is not supported as the application has not acceptably demonstrated that the full or partial use of the site could be used as other forms of social infrastructure contrary to Local Plan policy 16 and London Plan policy S1(G). |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London and Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the Mayoral CIL payable would be £5,550. based on the calculation of ?£25.00 per square metre and the Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (HCIL) would be a charge of ?£27,750 based on calculation of ?£125 per square metre. Each would be subject to indexation.
Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the Agent by email on the 17/12/21. |
